[Rejected] Resize/Scale Filter in Handbrake
Forum rules
*******************************
Please be aware we are now using GitHub for issue tracking and feature requests.
- This section of the forum is now closed to new topics.
*******************************
*******************************
Please be aware we are now using GitHub for issue tracking and feature requests.
- This section of the forum is now closed to new topics.
*******************************
Re: Resize/Scale Filter in Handbrake
Downsizing too much is much less likely to fill up a hard drive and possibly overwrite important data. There are also those that would code 4k and complain about speed...
Re: Resize/Scale Filter in Handbrake
Smithcraft wrote:s55 wrote:It's a deliberate design decision. it has nothing to do with difficulty.
I still do not understand though....
Re: [Rejected] Resize/Scale Filter in Handbrake
Well, get over it. Your suggestion has been rejected by the developers and that's that.
They don't have time to waste justifying the decision to you.
They don't have time to waste justifying the decision to you.
Re: Resize/Scale Filter in Handbrake
Previously answered:jacop89 wrote:
I still do not understand though....
mduell wrote: They just don't include a resizing direction that is rarely actually useful and would be mostly misused.
-
- Veteran User
- Posts: 2697
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:04 pm
Re: Resize/Scale Filter in Handbrake
That means that the developer thought about it, figured it wouldn't be too difficult to implement, but thought that the problems caused would outweigh any benefits.jacop89 wrote:Smithcraft wrote:s55 wrote:It's a deliberate design decision. it has nothing to do with difficulty.
I still do not understand though....
SC