Windows/Cygwin CLI from current svn
Intel E6600 Core 2 Duo overclocked to 3.4Ghz
2GB of DDR2-800 PC6400
handbrakecli -i . -o illusionist_full.mp4 -e x264 -q 0.70 -B 320 -6 -R 48 -m -p
2 CPUs detected
Opening ....
Scanning title 1...
+ title 1:
+ vts 1, ttn 1, cells 0->35 (3389859 blocks)
+ duration: 01:48:51
+ size: 720x480, aspect: 1.78, 23.976 fps
+ autocrop: 0/0/0/0
+ chapters:
...
+ audio tracks:
+ 1, English (AC3) (5.1 ch), 48000Hz, 448000bps
+ subtitle tracks:
x264 [info]: using SAR=32/27
x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities MMX MMXEXT SSE SSE2
No accelerated IMDCT transform found
Encoding: task 1 of 1, 100.00 % (65.45 fps, avg 48.80 fps, ETA 00h00m01s)
Windows - Intel E6600 OC'd to 3.4Ghz
Forum rules
Guide to Posting Benchmarks
Guide to Posting Benchmarks
I am really torn on if i want to fud around with all the oc'ing or if i should just get the quad core.. your results are impressive - how hard was it to get stable at those speeds?
I don't think there's a big difference in price between the e6600 and the core 2 quad.. but it looks like the quad isn't a big benefit for this as of now - i keep seeing low cpu utilization spread out - that doesn't help me rip faster!
I don't think there's a big difference in price between the e6600 and the core 2 quad.. but it looks like the quad isn't a big benefit for this as of now - i keep seeing low cpu utilization spread out - that doesn't help me rip faster!