SSD-PCIe vs. SATA

Post your testing results with HandBrake.
Post Reply
linuxuser
Bright Spark User
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 7:47 pm

SSD-PCIe vs. SATA

Post by linuxuser » Thu Sep 12, 2019 11:15 pm

Please move, if this is the wrong section.

Assuming, I have 2 SSDs, 1 with M.2-PCIe and 1 with SATA-SSD. Would you use the faster one for source files und the slower one for the output?

User avatar
Rodeo
HandBrake Team
Posts: 12195
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:55 pm

Re: SSD-PCIe vs. SATA

Post by Rodeo » Fri Sep 13, 2019 1:20 am

Irrelevant. Unless you're encoding raw uncompressed video, even a mechanical hard drive will have no impact on encoding performance whatsoever.

nhyone
Bright Spark User
Posts: 221
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 4:13 am

Re: SSD-PCIe vs. SATA

Post by nhyone » Fri Sep 13, 2019 3:21 am

Rodeo wrote:
Fri Sep 13, 2019 1:20 am
Irrelevant. Unless you're encoding raw uncompressed video, even a mechanical hard drive will have no impact on encoding performance whatsoever.
It may if you are encoding multiple videos at once. :D

Bandwidth is not the bottleneck, but seeking.

I would use SSD for source and spinning HD for output.

This is opposite of what you want cos, space-wise, source files are (much) bigger.

Woodstock
Veteran User
Posts: 3214
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2013 6:39 am

Re: SSD-PCIe vs. SATA

Post by Woodstock » Fri Sep 13, 2019 3:37 am

I use an NAS for source and destination. It has dedicated caching so running multiple encodes on different machines isn't an issue, even with multiple MakeMKV rips going on. Handbrake still ends up being CPU limited.

linuxuser
Bright Spark User
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 7:47 pm

Re: SSD-PCIe vs. SATA

Post by linuxuser » Fri Sep 13, 2019 5:19 am

I wonder why my Ubuntu-18.04-box has problems showing the file with the filemanager, the more videos are encoded. 1 video is ok with Thunar, with 3 or 4 I could take a minute until I see the files with the filemanager. The load can be over 20, cpu 95% or higher

Woodstock
Veteran User
Posts: 3214
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2013 6:39 am

Re: SSD-PCIe vs. SATA

Post by Woodstock » Fri Sep 13, 2019 12:59 pm

If filemanger works like Windows Explorer, it is trying to determine things about each file before it displays them. That involves opening them and reading part of the, to do it accurately. Windows Explorer gets REALLY slow when dealing with lots of media files in a directory.

linuxuser
Bright Spark User
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 7:47 pm

Re: SSD-PCIe vs. SATA

Post by linuxuser » Fri Sep 13, 2019 1:44 pm

I assume Windows Explorer doesn't work like Linux Thunar, but maybe. There are not so many files in a folder when I open it.Let's say 150 files / dirs. Normally it opens immediately, using 3 handbrake sessions, it gets very slow.

Post Reply