Considering upgrading memory

Post your testing results with HandBrake.
Post Reply
Smithcraft
Veteran User
Posts: 2691
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:04 pm

Considering upgrading memory

Post by Smithcraft » Fri Jan 27, 2017 11:30 am

Hello,

When I bought the new system, I went a bit cheap on the memory. It's DDR3 1600 11-11-11-28. My Windows Experience for memory is 5.9, which makes me :? since everything else is 7+.

I'm wondering if Handbrake would be happier with memory that has faster timing, or if it might only be marginally faster?

SC

rollin_eng
Veteran User
Posts: 2905
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 11:06 pm

Re: Considering upgrading memory

Post by rollin_eng » Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:52 pm

I doubt you will see an increase in speed for HB as it is usually the CPU that is the bottleneck.

That said faster memory is usually always better for your system so it's really a matter of if it is worth it to you.

Woodstock
Veteran User
Posts: 2815
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2013 6:39 am

Re: Considering upgrading memory

Post by Woodstock » Fri Jan 27, 2017 2:01 pm

Bring up task manager and watch the physical memory under performance as you encode a Bluray file. If you don't see it going over 50% use, "more RAM" isn't going to be a big help. As Rollin mentions, though, faster RAM may help, and if it's a bigger space... That's a bonus for running other things.

But faster doesn't necessarily mean the CPU can use the faster speed. If the motherboard was designed for 1600, that may be all the bandwidth that will be used, unless you overclock.

Smithcraft
Veteran User
Posts: 2691
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:04 pm

Re: Considering upgrading memory

Post by Smithcraft » Fri Jan 27, 2017 9:06 pm

Frys has some nice 9-9-9-24 on sale today. I might go and pick it up.

Can't help but get a larger space to work in, 'cuz 2017 vs 2013, for almost the same price.

SC

User avatar
Ritsuka
HandBrake Team
Posts: 1000
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:29 am

Re: Considering upgrading memory

Post by Ritsuka » Fri Jan 27, 2017 9:08 pm

Does your motherboard actually support faster ram?

User avatar
s55
HandBrake Team
Posts: 9259
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 1:05 pm

Re: Considering upgrading memory

Post by s55 » Fri Jan 27, 2017 9:20 pm

Faster timings just won't make much difference. It's bandwidth that helps HandBrake, and only in certain circumstances. I.e when using NLMeans with HD/4K content.

As long as you have free Memory, it's not worth it.

Smithcraft
Veteran User
Posts: 2691
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:04 pm

Re: Considering upgrading memory

Post by Smithcraft » Fri Jan 27, 2017 11:45 pm

Ritsuka wrote:Does your motherboard actually support faster ram?
Yes. It supports up to DDR3 3000.

SC

Smithcraft
Veteran User
Posts: 2691
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:04 pm

Re: Considering upgrading memory

Post by Smithcraft » Fri Jan 27, 2017 11:48 pm

Woodstock wrote:Bring up task manager and watch the physical memory under performance as you encode a Bluray file. If you don't see it going over 50% use, "more RAM" isn't going to be a big help. As Rollin mentions, though, faster RAM may help, and if it's a bigger space... That's a bonus for running other things.

But faster doesn't necessarily mean the CPU can use the faster speed. If the motherboard was designed for 1600, that may be all the bandwidth that will be used, unless you overclock.
Thanks!
s55 wrote:Faster timings just won't make much difference. It's bandwidth that helps HandBrake, and only in certain circumstances. I.e when using NLMeans with HD/4K content.

As long as you have free Memory, it's not worth it.
Thanks s55!

I have a memory gadget on the desktop and with 4 GB, I never seem to max out my free memory.

SC

Smithcraft
Veteran User
Posts: 2691
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:04 pm

Re: Considering upgrading memory

Post by Smithcraft » Fri Feb 24, 2017 8:54 am

The good news - There was another sale. So now I have a WEI score of 7.8 for memory! :D

The results:
11-11-11-28 2x2GB
work: average encoding speed for job is 30.178352 fps

11-11-11-28 2x4GB (comparing memory space against the old memory speed)
work: average encoding speed for job is 29.442677 fps :x

9-9-9-24 2x4GB (comparing memory speed and space against the old memory speed)
work: average encoding speed for job is 29.833830 fps :?

That's with the tried and true Big Buck Bunny (1080p) with the nightly release 2016121501.

Everything else being equal, maybe 4GB is the sweet spot?

SC

User avatar
Rodeo
HandBrake Team
Posts: 11954
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:55 pm

Re: Considering upgrading memory

Post by Rodeo » Fri Feb 24, 2017 10:26 am

The difference is way too small to be statistically significant, unless you maybe ran each encode 100 times and average the resulting encoding speeds.

rollin_eng
Veteran User
Posts: 2905
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 11:06 pm

Re: Considering upgrading memory

Post by rollin_eng » Fri Feb 24, 2017 10:38 am

Yeah, I always assumed windows has so many services/processes running that you can never get exact number. I wonder if Linux would be better as I imagine its easier to kill unnecessary tasks.

Smithcraft
Veteran User
Posts: 2691
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:04 pm

Re: Considering upgrading memory

Post by Smithcraft » Sat Feb 25, 2017 12:42 am

Rodeo wrote:
Fri Feb 24, 2017 10:26 am
The difference is way too small to be statistically significant, unless you maybe ran each encode 100 times and average the resulting encoding speeds.
I was thinking about that too. I wasn't interested in doing that many encodes though! I wanted to get that memory in. I guess I should have done it at least three times each, but I wasn't interested in that either. :wink: I guess I could have just clicked on add to the queue a couple of times...

Oddly I did a bit more mouse clicking on stuff when I was doing the first test to get my baseline so I figured that would have been the slowest.

SC

Smithcraft
Veteran User
Posts: 2691
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:04 pm

Re: Considering upgrading memory

Post by Smithcraft » Sat Feb 25, 2017 12:46 am

rollin_eng wrote:
Fri Feb 24, 2017 10:38 am
Yeah, I always assumed windows has so many services/processes running that you can never get exact number. I wonder if Linux would be better as I imagine its easier to kill unnecessary tasks.
I had quite the nightmare trying to get Ubuntu installed and up to date when I bought this system a few years ago. I guess the LTS version was just about due to be updated and that was the only one I could get that would install easily, but then updating it 5 times make for too much :x :x :x

SC

nhyone
Bright Spark User
Posts: 196
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 4:13 am

Re: Considering upgrading memory

Post by nhyone » Sat Feb 25, 2017 3:07 am

I doubt you'll find much difference. Encoding a single video isn't that memory bandwidth intensive.

Outside of memory benchmarks and (large) file compression, the difference between fast and slow memory, double / triple channels are hard to measure.

Once, I had a colleague who had a choice between 12 GB triple channel or 32 GB double channel memory. In the end he opted for the first cos memory benchmark showed it was 10-15% faster. In real-world usage, the difference is maybe 0.5-1%.

But he really needed more memory to run his VMs, so I think it was a poor trade-off.

Post Reply