HandBrake 1.0.x Discussion Thread

General questions or discussion about HandBrake, Video and/or audio transcoding, trends etc.
pafri
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 7:24 am

Re: HandBrake 1.0.0 Discussion Thread - Lozalization files

Post by pafri »

There are the localization files with 678 strings in the HandBrake-1.0.0/gtk/po folder of HandBrake source archive.
Looking at the statistics on Transifex (https://www.transifex.com/victorr2007/h ... dashboard/) we can see:

HandBrake-0.10 - 678 strings
HandBrake-0.10.1 - 713 strings
HandBrake-0.10.2 - 728 strings
HandBrake-0.10.3 - 753 strings

ready to use.

Also the 1.0.0 version comes with the files prepared for 0.10?
User avatar
s55
HandBrake Team
Posts: 10357
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 1:05 pm

Re: HandBrake 1.0.0 Discussion Thread

Post by s55 »

We don't maintain that translation board. John occasionally pulls from it though.
User avatar
JohnAStebbins
HandBrake Team
Posts: 5722
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 7:21 pm

Re: HandBrake 1.0.0 Discussion Thread - Lozalization files

Post by JohnAStebbins »

pafri wrote:There are the localization files with 678 strings in the HandBrake-1.0.0/gtk/po folder of HandBrake source archive.
Looking at the statistics on Transifex (https://www.transifex.com/victorr2007/h ... dashboard/) we can see:

HandBrake-0.10 - 678 strings
HandBrake-0.10.1 - 713 strings
HandBrake-0.10.2 - 728 strings
HandBrake-0.10.3 - 753 strings

ready to use.

Also the 1.0.0 version comes with the files prepared for 0.10?
I don't participate in the translation project on transifex, but I'm glad to merge translations as they are supplied to me. Victor used to be fairly proactive in providing updates, but I haven't heard from him in a while. And nobody has even been attempting to provide translations for the development code which becomes the next release, so the translations from the old 0.10 release are the best available to me.
evanonthegc
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2016 7:40 pm

Re: HandBrake 1.0.0 Discussion Thread

Post by evanonthegc »

Is it worth re-encoding my existing mkv files?

i.e. Will I end up with a smaller file &/or a better encode?

I'm encoding for an Apple TV 4. On the old version I was encoding using the Apple TV3 preset.
User avatar
s55
HandBrake Team
Posts: 10357
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 1:05 pm

Re: HandBrake 1.0.0 Discussion Thread

Post by s55 »

Unless you go H.264 -> H.265, No. (Which I don't think the appleTv supports anyway.)
HolgerMH
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2016 5:28 pm

Re: HandBrake 1.0.0 Discussion Thread

Post by HolgerMH »

s55 wrote:HandBrake only requires .NET 4.6 not 4.6.2 so you can download that manually from Microsoft.
I now have NET 4.6 (listed as ''Full'' and ''Client'' after Reboot), Handbrake 1.0.0. installs ok and crashes on start.
User avatar
s55
HandBrake Team
Posts: 10357
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 1:05 pm

Re: HandBrake 1.0.0 Discussion Thread

Post by s55 »

Create a post on the Windows forum and provide the crash information. We can take a look.
HolgerMH
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2016 5:28 pm

Re: HandBrake 1.0.0 Discussion Thread

Post by HolgerMH »

s55 wrote:Create a post on the Windows forum and provide the crash information. We can take a look.
According to the handbook (https://handbrake.fr/docs/en/1.0.0/help ... ssues.html)
it states "Make sure you have Microsoft .NET Framework 4.6.1 or later installed on your system"
according to MS (https://msdn.microsoft.com/de-de/librar ... .110).aspx) vista only works with
"NET Framework 4.6" at the best. So taking those facts together 1.0.0. can't work on vista. This seems to be a dead end.
User avatar
s55
HandBrake Team
Posts: 10357
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 1:05 pm

Re: HandBrake 1.0.0 Discussion Thread

Post by s55 »

HandBrake will run fine on 4.6. It's compiled to 4.6 Only. Not 4.6.1 to maintain that backward compatibility. However, as a general note, I would always encourage people to install the latest for their platform be that 4.6, 4.6.1 or 4.6.2

If you have 4.6 and it's not working, please do report it on the windows forum and we can try help. It should work.
cmecak
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 8:39 am

Re: HandBrake 1.0.0 Discussion Thread

Post by cmecak »

I installed HandBrake v 1.0.0 and have tested out Dolby TruHD passthrough, which works well for making mkvs. The 7.1 audio came through on my BD rip. However, would it be possible to encode this 7.1 TruHD stream to something in a smaller file size and more efficient, like E-AC-3 7.1 or AAC 7.1? Currently, the re-encode only goes to maximum 5.1 channels.

Even better would be the ability to re-encode a Dolby Atmos TruHD stream to a Dolby Atmos E-AC-3 (DD+) stream.

Thanks.
pafri
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 7:24 am

Re: HandBrake 1.0.0 Discussion Thread - Lozalization files

Post by pafri »

JohnAStebbins wrote:
pafri wrote:There are the localization files with 678 strings in the HandBrake-1.0.0/gtk/po folder of HandBrake source archive.
Looking at the statistics on Transifex (https://www.transifex.com/victorr2007/h ... dashboard/) we can see:

HandBrake-0.10 - 678 strings
HandBrake-0.10.1 - 713 strings
HandBrake-0.10.2 - 728 strings
HandBrake-0.10.3 - 753 strings

ready to use.

Also the 1.0.0 version comes with the files prepared for 0.10?
I don't participate in the translation project on transifex, but I'm glad to merge translations as they are supplied to me. Victor used to be fairly proactive in providing updates, but I haven't heard from him in a while. And nobody has even been attempting to provide translations for the development code which becomes the next release, so the translations from the old 0.10 release are the best available to me.
The last version (0.10.3) present/available for use on Transifex has 100 % translation (including English) on translators side for 9 languages (Chinese (China), Czech, German, Italian, Russian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish), 99 % translation for Japanese, 95 % translation for Romanian, 89 % translation for Swedish, 82 % translation for Thai, 80 % translation for Chinese (Taiwan), and some others with less %.

As it seems, the localization files are prepared, that's not the issue, and are waiting for usage for about one year.
User avatar
s55
HandBrake Team
Posts: 10357
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 1:05 pm

Re: HandBrake 1.0.0 Discussion Thread

Post by s55 »

There are no prepared translations for 1.0

We do not manage these ourselves. It's a 3rd party.
mareri91
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2016 11:24 pm

Re: HandBrake 1.0.0 Discussion Thread

Post by mareri91 »

What happened to the Quicksync encoder? It now uses 100% of my CPU (on 0.10.5 it barely made a dent). Is this a bug?
gorek
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 7:42 pm

Re: HandBrake 1.0.0 Discussion Thread

Post by gorek »

Where should I request a feature? I'm hoping for a "core" audio mix option that will separate the DTS and AC3 core tracks from DTS-HD and TrueHD. Its part of mkvmerge.
mduell
Veteran User
Posts: 8196
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 8:54 pm

Re: HandBrake 1.0.0 Discussion Thread

Post by mduell »

mareri91 wrote:What happened to the Quicksync encoder? It now uses 100% of my CPU (on 0.10.5 it barely made a dent). Is this a bug?
It's still there. You should start a thread in the support forum with your logs.
gorek wrote:Where should I request a feature? I'm hoping for a "core" audio mix option that will separate the DTS and AC3 core tracks from DTS-HD and TrueHD. Its part of mkvmerge.
In the feature request forum.
User avatar
JohnAStebbins
HandBrake Team
Posts: 5722
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 7:21 pm

Re: HandBrake 1.0.0 Discussion Thread

Post by JohnAStebbins »

gorek wrote:Where should I request a feature? I'm hoping for a "core" audio mix option that will separate the DTS and AC3 core tracks from DTS-HD and TrueHD. Its part of mkvmerge.
Ummm, HandBrake already does this. For every DTS-HD and TrueHD audio track, HandBrake also gives you a DTS and AC3 audio track which is the "core".
ddwrt
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 4:20 pm

Re: HandBrake 1.0.0 Discussion Thread

Post by ddwrt »

Guys, the main page offers to download version 1.0.1, yet it says in the news that the latest version is 1.0.0. Also 1.0.1 thread - viewtopic.php?f=33&p=166787#p166787 leads to this thread
User avatar
s55
HandBrake Team
Posts: 10357
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 1:05 pm

Re: HandBrake 1.0.0 Discussion Thread

Post by s55 »

1.0.1 is a minor bugfix release only, so we can continue the 1.0 discussion here.
ddwrt
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 4:20 pm

Re: HandBrake 1.0.0 Discussion Thread

Post by ddwrt »

Okay, fine then. May I ask what is the difference between Decomb and Yadif filters in the new version? I thought that Decomb uses yadif while deinterlacing or something.
rob.lowe1
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2017 9:28 am

Autofilled title tag, size mystery...Re: HandBrake 1.0.x Discussion Thread

Post by rob.lowe1 »

hi, *nix version, since 1.0.0, the title tag is filled automatically, but I don't want a tag, and besides, it is wrong!11!!! as it cuts off at the first dot and I use the filename by default.

Since I cannot remember to clear the tag each time, I am forced to use mkvtoolnix to rip out the title and it finishes with ~3-6MB smaller on a <>=Gig .mkv file, which has not previously been the case. Is this a bug??? (this occurs even if there is no change made to the file, just a run through mkvtoolnix takes a 256.3MB file down to 252.9MB)

Thanks

sorry, forgot, the entire handbrake window, windowed or maxed, is now too tall for my native laptop resolution 768 and cuts off the bottom status text line halfway.
JohnFrost
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 7:20 am

Re: HandBrake 1.0.x Discussion Thread

Post by JohnFrost »

Why is 1.0.1 so slow compared to the last beta version? I'm getting conversion speeds that are up to four times slower
User avatar
Ritsuka
HandBrake Team
Posts: 1655
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:29 am

Re: HandBrake 1.0.x Discussion Thread

Post by Ritsuka »

Because you are using different settings, different versions of the filters/encoders etc… but without a log who knows.
JohnFrost
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 7:20 am

Re: HandBrake 1.0.x Discussion Thread

Post by JohnFrost »

Actually the settings are exactly the same. The filters and encoders are exactly the same as well. I'll check the logs and see if can pick anything up. I'm using El Capitan (the latest version).

Thanks for the prompt reply.
rollin_eng
Veteran User
Posts: 4853
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 11:06 pm

Re: HandBrake 1.0.x Discussion Thread

Post by rollin_eng »

JohnFrost wrote:Actually the settings are exactly the same. The filters and encoders are exactly the same as well. I'll check the logs and see if can pick anything up. I'm using El Capitan (the latest version).

Thanks for the prompt reply.

Could you please post your logs, instructions can be found here:

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=31236
mduell
Veteran User
Posts: 8196
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 8:54 pm

Re: HandBrake 1.0.x Discussion Thread

Post by mduell »

JohnFrost wrote:Actually the settings are exactly the same. The filters and encoders are exactly the same as well.
BS
Post Reply