With upcoming changes to data protection and privacy laws in Europe coming into effect soon, we thought this would be a good time to remind everyone that we do have a privacy policy.
This applies to all users and visitors world-wide.

We have made a few changes to the language to make it clearer in relation to this new regulation but fundamentally, the terms and your rights are unchanged.

If you have any questions about this, please feel free to ask in the General Forum

General Expectations for H.265

General discussion of HandBrake, Video and/or audio transcoding, trends etc.
Forum rules
Please be aware, this forum is not for support or help related to HandBrake. Please keep such discussions to the Community Support forum sections.
Post Reply
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2018 2:01 pm

General Expectations for H.265

Post by electricOzone » Tue Mar 06, 2018 2:07 pm

Hello all!

I received my Asus BW-16D1HT several days ago and am finally working on encoding some proper UHD rips.

I'm using the following settings for my first UHD encode:
H.265 10-bit
RF: 23
Constant Framerate
Constant Quality
Preset: veryslow
Tune: None
Profile: auto

Now, I understand H.265 is very CPU-intensive, and that that is only compounded by using H.265 on UHD files. I'm seeing about 110h for a feature-length movie. Does that fall in line with what others are seeing? I'm running an i7-6700K.

First movie is Guardians of the Galaxy Pt.II, then on to Dunkirk and Bram Stoker's Dracula!

New User
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2018 3:04 pm

Re: General Expectations for H.265

Post by Saibashi » Tue Mar 13, 2018 4:37 pm

I'm using a slightly older processor and 1080 resolution but, no 110 hours doesn't surprise me with your setup. You might want to take a minute of your original source file, and fiddle around with the encoding settings to find a version that's high enough quality, and takes a reasonable amount of time. I'd start with the video processing speed preset (there's a reason they call it "very slow"!) On ultrafast, I usually get 15fps processing speed at 1080, which gets the processing speed to 4x the video length (an insanely long amount of time compared to h.264, but worth it for the file size). If you don't like the quality, bump the RF down to 22 or 21.

Veteran User
Posts: 2709
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 11:06 pm

Re: General Expectations for H.265

Post by rollin_eng » Tue Mar 13, 2018 5:56 pm

Could you please post your logs, instructions can be found here:

https://handbrake.fr/docs/en/latest/hel ... y-log.html

Veteran User
Posts: 5901
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 8:54 pm

Re: General Expectations for H.265

Post by mduell » Tue Mar 13, 2018 8:25 pm

You picked veryslow settings, on a slow encoder, with high res content... yea, days is not a surprise.

Post Reply