Elgato Turbo.264 HD, iPad and more

HandBrake for Mac support
Forum rules
An Activity Log is required for support requests. Please read How-to get an activity log? for details on how and why this should be provided.
Post Reply
rasmusjv
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 11:30 am

Elgato Turbo.264 HD, iPad and more

Post by rasmusjv »

Hi,

A new user here. And of course I got a lot of questions, but manly only a couple.

1. Can I make use of my Elgato Turbo.264 HD to speed up Conversation? XviD -> iPad/iPhone/iPod Touch?
2. Is there any "good" iPad preset to be found?

Thanks for your time.

Best regards

Rasmus, Denmark
User avatar
s55
HandBrake Team
Posts: 10357
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 1:05 pm

Re: Elgato Turbo.264 HD, iPad and more

Post by s55 »

No and no, there is no ipad preset however,

All of HandBrakes presets will work with the iPad with the following exceptions:
Normal and High profile will need their output resolution reduced to 720p if your encoding HD content.
Deleted User 11865

Re: Elgato Turbo.264 HD, iPad and more

Post by Deleted User 11865 »

s55 wrote:No and no, there is no ipad preset however,

All of HandBrakes presets will work with the iPad with the following exceptions:
Normal and High profile will need their output resolution reduced to 720p if your encoding HD content.
And the framerate must not exceed 30 fps.
alehel
Experienced
Posts: 83
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:08 am

Re: Elgato Turbo.264 HD, iPad and more

Post by alehel »

the turbo.264 really is a great product, but if you want control over your export settings, go for handbrake despite the lack of turbo.264 support.

While we are on the topic, would it be possible for handbrake to support the turbo.264 device at all? It's a great product and I would love to be able to take advantage of it.
nightstrm
Veteran User
Posts: 1887
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 5:43 am

Re: Elgato Turbo.264 HD, iPad and more

Post by nightstrm »

God no. It sucks.
LinBrake
Experienced
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:39 am

Re: Elgato Turbo.264 HD, iPad and more

Post by LinBrake »

nightstrm wrote:God no. It sucks.
I agree.

My testing with one of those devices yielded no improvements at all when comparing Quicktime 7 MKV to MP4 to Handbrake MKV to MP4. It was sometimes a lot slower than Handbrake consuming around the same amount of CPU as Handbrake. I returned the unit after that.
hh83917
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 3:08 pm

Re: Elgato Turbo.264 HD, iPad and more

Post by hh83917 »

After Handbrake went 64bit, turbo264 is no longer useful for me. I used to only use the turbo264 for quick encoding on-the-go, but still use Handbrake for iTunes storage. Now Handbrake is so fast, I'd just rather have better quality video all the time. :D
nekogami13
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:07 pm

Re: Elgato Turbo.264 HD, iPad and more

Post by nekogami13 »

handbrake time to encode eyetv 1080p recording(21 minutes, 2.2gb) to appletv preset -33 minutes.
TurboHd-9 minutes to appleTv preset.
I guess "fast" is a relative term.

Handbrake is wonderful for DVD's, but I use other stuff for everything else.
I want a quick rip for iphone-turbohd or videomonkey(metatagging ftw).
LinBrake
Experienced
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:39 am

Re: Elgato Turbo.264 HD, iPad and more

Post by LinBrake »

The presets may not be equal so it is not a good speed comparison. The legacy AppleTV preset was faster too, but lower quality.
dynaflash
Veteran User
Posts: 3820
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:19 pm

Re: Elgato Turbo.264 HD, iPad and more

Post by dynaflash »

nekogami13 wrote:handbrake time to encode eyetv 1080p recording(21 minutes, 2.2gb) to appletv preset -33 minutes.
TurboHd-9 minutes to appleTv preset.
Um, and so the TurboHD has the same preset that HB has to make this an even comparison ? I think not.
nekogami13
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:07 pm

Re: Elgato Turbo.264 HD, iPad and more

Post by nekogami13 »

Yep, both outputting 960x540 h.264 video.
Deleted User 11865

Re: Elgato Turbo.264 HD, iPad and more

Post by Deleted User 11865 »

nekogami13 wrote:Yep, both outputting 960x540 h.264 video.
The Turbo.264's compression efficiency is nowehere near that of the AppleTV preset. By using faster x264 options, you can easily double the speed compared to the AppleTV preset.
thompson
Bright Spark User
Posts: 356
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 8:04 pm

Re: Elgato Turbo.264 HD, iPad and more

Post by thompson »

nekogami13 wrote:Yep, both outputting 960x540 h.264 video.
Because clearly that's all there is to video encoding, dimensions and the name of the encoder.
nekogami13
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:07 pm

Re: Elgato Turbo.264 HD, iPad and more

Post by nekogami13 »

Using the appletv preset, doesn't handbrake default to the most efficient and fastest settings to achieve it?
If not, why not?

I am not at my computer at this moment-so I cannot compare the bitrate, etc.

My personel experience is the turbohd is faster then handbrake when converting my HD content.
I prefer videomonkey for non-DVD stuff because of metatagging.
nekogami13
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:07 pm

Re: Elgato Turbo.264 HD, iPad and more

Post by nekogami13 »

Here is more info:
Handbrake 64bit-37 minutes
AppleTv preset-x264
Output
960x540
1507 Kbps bitrate
Main profile L3.1
29.904 fps
CABAC-no
QF 0.061


TurboHd
AppleTv 150% setting(upped to high bitrate)-apple quicktime encoder-9 minutes
Output
960x540
3748 Kbps bitrate
Main L3.1
29.970 FPS
CABAC 3 reference frames
QF 0.208
creamyhorror
Enlightened
Posts: 134
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 2:00 pm

Re: Elgato Turbo.264 HD, iPad and more

Post by creamyhorror »

nekogami13 wrote:Using the appletv preset, doesn't handbrake default to the most efficient and fastest settings to achieve it?
If not, why not?
Settings can't be both fast and efficient. Fast settings are less bitrate-efficient, i.e. they result in less quality for the same bitrate. Slow settings are more bitrate-efficient. Handbrake relies on the x264 encoder, which retains a high quality on default settings. If you modified the settings in Handbrake to faster ones, you'd probably be able to match the speed of Turbo.264 and produce higher quality video. Conversely, it's pretty unlikely you can get Turbo.264 to match x264's quality, even turning up the settings to maximum.
nightstrm
Veteran User
Posts: 1887
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 5:43 am

Re: Elgato Turbo.264 HD, iPad and more

Post by nightstrm »

nekogami13 wrote:Using the appletv preset, doesn't handbrake default to the most efficient and fastest settings to achieve it?
If not, why not?
Because the Apple presets were designed to hold quality and size to a higher standard than encoding speed. You can remove some of the advanced x264 features to increase encoding speed if you want, but you'll sacrifice size (and possibly quality, depending on what exactly you change).
Deleted User 11865

Re: Elgato Turbo.264 HD, iPad and more

Post by Deleted User 11865 »

nekogami13 wrote:Here is more info:
Handbrake 64bit-37 minutes
AppleTv preset-x264
Output
960x540
1507 Kbps bitrate
Main profile L3.1
The current AppleTV preset does not produce Main Profile H.264. What version of HandBrake are you using?
mduell
Veteran User
Posts: 8198
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 8:54 pm

Re: Elgato Turbo.264 HD, iPad and more

Post by mduell »

If you're OK with tripling the video bitrate you can make Handbrake go a lot faster with simpler/less efficient encoding.
Post Reply