x265 version 1.8
Forum rules
*******************************
Please be aware we are now using GitHub for issue tracking and feature requests.
- This section of the forum is now closed to new topics.
*******************************
*******************************
Please be aware we are now using GitHub for issue tracking and feature requests.
- This section of the forum is now closed to new topics.
*******************************
-
- Novice
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2014 11:19 am
x265 version 1.8
Please describe what you would like to see added to HandBrake:
bumping to x265 version 1.8
just wanted to report the new version
Why would you like to see this added:
big changes
What version of HandBrake are you currently running:
What operating system and version and you currently running (e.g. OSX 10.11, Windows 7, Ubuntu 14):
bumping to x265 version 1.8
just wanted to report the new version
Why would you like to see this added:
big changes
What version of HandBrake are you currently running:
What operating system and version and you currently running (e.g. OSX 10.11, Windows 7, Ubuntu 14):
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2015 7:14 am
Re: x265 version 1.8
Dear friend,
kindly make possible handbrake to run on windows 7 with .Net framework of 4.5 or below. because many operating system not supporting .Net framework of 4.6 which is currently needed by nightly build-ed version of handbrake. handbrake version HandBrake-f9c5593_x86_64-Win_GUI.exe needed .Net framework of 4.6, which is not possible to run on Win 7 32 bit OS. hope you consider this request.
kindly make possible handbrake to run on windows 7 with .Net framework of 4.5 or below. because many operating system not supporting .Net framework of 4.6 which is currently needed by nightly build-ed version of handbrake. handbrake version HandBrake-f9c5593_x86_64-Win_GUI.exe needed .Net framework of 4.6, which is not possible to run on Win 7 32 bit OS. hope you consider this request.
- JohnAStebbins
- HandBrake Team
- Posts: 5723
- Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 7:21 pm
Re: x265 version 1.8
WTF does this have to do with x265 version 1.8? Open your own request thread!cda02101982 wrote:Dear friend,
kindly make possible handbrake to run on windows 7 with .Net framework of 4.5 or below. because many operating system not supporting .Net framework of 4.6 which is currently needed by nightly build-ed version of handbrake. handbrake version HandBrake-f9c5593_x86_64-Win_GUI.exe needed .Net framework of 4.6, which is not possible to run on Win 7 32 bit OS. hope you consider this request.
- JohnAStebbins
- HandBrake Team
- Posts: 5723
- Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 7:21 pm
Re: x265 version 1.8
We are well aware of version bumps in libraries that HandBrake uses. We update as time permits *if* there are changes to the library that are significant to HandBrake. In the case of x265, there are bug fixes and improvements that are of interest.Lazyncoder wrote:Please describe what you would like to see added to HandBrake:
bumping to x265 version 1.8
just wanted to report the new version
Why would you like to see this added:
big changes
What version of HandBrake are you currently running:
What operating system and version and you currently running (e.g. OSX 10.11, Windows 7, Ubuntu 14):
Also, their source release appears to be fubar. It is not posted to the link they provide in "Release tarballs" on https://bitbucket.org/multicoreware/x265/wiki/Home
There is a x268_1.8.tar.gz posted under the "downloads" link on that page, but the md5 does not match what they give on that page and the top directory within that tar does not match their regular release practice of using the release name e.g. x264_1.8.
So until they get their [Censored] together, this is on hold.
Re: x265 version 1.8
Good catch.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2014 11:19 am
Re: x265 version 1.8
Thank you so much.JohnAStebbins wrote: We are well aware of version bumps in libraries that HandBrake uses. We update as time permits *if* there are changes to the library that are significant to HandBrake. In the case of x265, there are bug fixes and improvements that are of interest.
Also, their source release appears to be fubar. It is not posted to the link they provide in "Release tarballs" on https://bitbucket.org/multicoreware/x265/wiki/Home
There is a x268_1.8.tar.gz posted under the "downloads" link on that page, but the md5 does not match what they give on that page and the top directory within that tar does not match their regular release practice of using the release name e.g. x264_1.8.
So until they get their [Censored] together, this is on hold.
x265_1.8.tar.gz just uploaded here. Checked the MD5 and it's match the one they provided here
hope this helps.
- JohnAStebbins
- HandBrake Team
- Posts: 5723
- Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 7:21 pm
Re: x265 version 1.8
Dude, you need to relax. I already told you we are on top of these things. Give it a rest already!
-
- Novice
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2014 11:19 am
Re: x265 version 1.8
just trying to help... :-)JohnAStebbins wrote:Dude, you need to relax. I already told you we are on top of these things. Give it a rest already!
Re: x265 version 1.8
x265 1.8 is used in the nightly, but will it be "backported" to 0.10.2?
On RHEL 6.7, I was able to replace the bundled 1.5 with 1.8 as-is (remove the patch files in contrib/x265 and edit module.defs to point to the 1.8 URL). It compiled and seemed to work fine. I was trying my luck.
On RHEL 6.7, I was able to replace the bundled 1.5 with 1.8 as-is (remove the patch files in contrib/x265 and edit module.defs to point to the 1.8 URL). It compiled and seemed to work fine. I was trying my luck.
Re: x265 version 1.8
Nope. .x releases are for bug fixes only.
Re: x265 version 1.8
Man, get a rest already! You are [Censored] unfriendly!JohnAStebbins wrote:Dude, you need to relax. I already told you we are on top of these things. Give it a rest already!
As a new Handbrake user I came here to participate. But no, not after I have seen some of your responses. All the best to you.
Re: x265 version 1.8
It's a little disconcerting that you created a forum account just to reply to a comment on an old thread not even directed at you. That said, you're welcome to participate if you desire. Most of us try to be friendly most of the time. Lead by example, perhaps?fgvhjnftj wrote:Man, get a rest already! You are [Censored] unfriendly!
As a new Handbrake user I came here to participate. But no, not after I have seen some of your responses. All the best to you.
This thread has run its course. Locking for now.