[Implemented] h265 support

Archive of historical feature requests.
Please use the GitHub link above to report issues.
Forum rules
*******************************
Please be aware we are now using GitHub for issue tracking and feature requests.
- This section of the forum is now closed to new topics.

*******************************
Post Reply
nendever98
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2014 12:00 pm

[Implemented] h265 support

Post by nendever98 »

please add h265 support
User avatar
s55
HandBrake Team
Posts: 9971
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 1:05 pm

Re: h265 support

Post by s55 »

The experimental x265 encoder has already been added. Should be a nice encoder in a year or so when they finish implementing it.
User avatar
Rodeo
HandBrake Team
Posts: 12757
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:55 pm

Re: h265 support

Post by Rodeo »

s55 wrote:The experimental x265 encoder has already been added. Should be a nice encoder in a year or so when they finish implementing it.
An encoder is never finished :P
User avatar
s55
HandBrake Team
Posts: 9971
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 1:05 pm

Re: h265 support

Post by s55 »

OK, usable then :/
Djfe
Bright Spark User
Posts: 178
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 8:01 pm

Re: h265 support

Post by Djfe »

it's usable and the VLC Media Player plays the files nicely. (DivX doesn't although they claim to support it :roll: lol)
But there is no advanced tab
and video tune features (film, animation, grain,...), profile selection (baseline,main,high), level selection and stuff like that aren't added, yet.

And most importantly: fine tuning is probably needed still to increase the encoders effiency and speed.
User avatar
s55
HandBrake Team
Posts: 9971
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 1:05 pm

Re: h265 support

Post by s55 »

choices for x265 will probably expand over time. There are no plans to add an advanced tab for x265 or any other encoder. The x264 one is now deprecated. So basically it'll get left in until something breaks it or it gets in the way of doing something else.

You can still specify any encoder argument through the extra arguments box anyway.
Ayoross
Posts: 48
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 9:07 pm

Re: h265 support

Post by Ayoross »

Hi all!

I've done some tests with HEVC encoder, svn6185. Here are the results.
I'm using q=21.5, audio DTS-HD MA + AC3 passthrough. AVC preset = very slow, HEVC preset = slow, main profile

Under the dome, blu-ray rip :
S1E01 : AVC = 2.67 GB - HEVC = 1.53 GB (-43%)
S1E02 : AVC = 2.51 GB - HEVC = 1.64 GB (-35%)
S1E03 : AVC = 2.36 GB - HEVC = 1.31 GB (-45%)

If you just look the video stream size, we have:
S1E01 : AVC = 1904 MB, HEVC = 749 MB (-61%)
S1E02 : AVC = 1747 MB, HEVC = 857 MB (-51%)
S1E03 : AVC = 1699 MB, HEVC = 619 MB (-64%)
User avatar
Rodeo
HandBrake Team
Posts: 12757
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:55 pm

Re: h265 support

Post by Rodeo »

Because you use the same rate factor (RF, aka -q in HandBrakeCLI) doesn't mean the output quality is the same. The same RF will results in a different quality depending on which x264 settings you use, so you can't use the file size at a given RF as a measure of compression efficiency even with the same encoder. Doing the same with two different encoders means even less, if such a thing is possible.
Ayoross
Posts: 48
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 9:07 pm

Re: h265 support

Post by Ayoross »

OK, so it seems impossible to compare the compression ratio of HEVC and AVC ...!
Anyway, I get files with a quite similar quality and very different sizes. This comparison may not be scientific, but I'm not sure it's absolutely meaningless.
User avatar
JohnAStebbins
HandBrake Team
Posts: 5588
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 7:21 pm

Re: h265 support

Post by JohnAStebbins »

The comparison isn't helpful unless you also supply clips of source and encodes so that interested parties can *see* the relative quality or you can produce quality metrics like SSIM for both encodes so that the quality can be compared. The opinion of an untrained eye can't be trusted.
AAT
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 9:35 pm

Re: [Implemented] h265 support

Post by AAT »

Well that is cool now H265 support also added. I've run my regular test too and noticed in quality no difference, but encoding took an hour longer, which otherwise takes only 9 minutes. File size is about the same. I'll later test with Bluray also, it was just DVD. Are the new Intel CPUs will receive H265 support or when will improving the encoding speed?
gmb
Bright Spark User
Posts: 348
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 12:49 pm

Re: [Implemented] h265 support

Post by gmb »

In my tests H264 has noticeably better video quality than h265. Maybe not that surprising, it's too early for h265. Maybe in a year. Also the encoding speed is extremely slow.
flvhosting
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2014 7:29 pm

Re: [Implemented] h265 support

Post by flvhosting »

Thanks for adding HEVC encode support this will be interesting as time evolves
Post Reply