Page 2 of 2

Re: VP8, VP9 WebM encoding feature. Theora

Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2014 7:44 am
by rrunner64
At least one person cares about it. :lol: Encoding is much faster now. Thank you!

@mduell: I wanted to make sure that it is really a bug and not a missing feature before creating a bug report with activity log.

Re: VP8, VP9 WebM encoding feature. Theora

Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2014 2:53 pm
by JohnAStebbins
rrunner64 wrote: @mduell: I wanted to make sure that it is really a bug and not a missing feature before creating a bug report with activity log.
We require activity logs for all support requests because users almost always don't supply enough information for us to help them. And we don't like the 20 questions game.

Re: VP8, VP9 WebM encoding feature. Theora

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 4:05 am
by TedJ
JohnAStebbins wrote:And we don't like the 20 questions game.
20 questions?


Are you a tank? ;)

Re: VP8, VP9 WebM encoding feature. Theora

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2014 7:53 am
by Sarreq Teryx
I'm going to +1 VP9 and WebM

WebM is basically MKV anyway, so it shouldn't be too hard to implement.

as for VP9, I realize it's not very usable just yet, so take your time.

Re: VP8, VP9 WebM encoding feature. Theora

Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2014 4:38 pm
by mduell
Sarreq Teryx wrote:I'm going to +1 VP9 and WebM
s55 wrote:
https://forum.handbrake.fr/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=18881 wrote:If a request already exists, you do not need to "+1" it. Features included in HandBrake are driven by developer interest and not user demand.
Sarreq Teryx wrote:WebM is basically MKV anyway, so it shouldn't be too hard to implement.
Welcome to submit your own patch.

Re: VP8, VP9 WebM encoding feature. Theora

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 6:34 pm
by gbcox
I'm using VP8 and so far have been happy with it. I've compared it with x264 on several tests and prefer the results with the VP8 encoder for the same size file. It does take longer to encode however, but I don't sit around and watch it so that doesn't bother me. Looking forward to seeing VP9 so I can do some comparison testing. I did try the x265 encoder and it IMHO was completely unusable - extremely slow and the resulting video had severe audio sync issues.

Re: VP8, VP9 WebM encoding feature. Theora

Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 7:55 pm
by VP10
When is VP9 encoding coming to Handbrake? Google is already working on VP10...
http://www.cnet.com/news/googles-web-vi ... y-reality/

Re: VP8, VP9 WebM encoding feature. Theora

Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 8:01 pm
by JohnAStebbins
When it can encode a typical movie in less than a month.

Re: VP8, VP9 WebM encoding feature. Theora

Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 8:24 pm
by VP10
JohnAStebbins wrote:When it can encode a typical movie in less than a month.
Yikes. It still takes that long? Why hasn't google or anyone done anything to make a faster encoder?

Re: VP8, VP9 WebM encoding feature. Theora

Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2014 8:27 pm
by Deleted User 11865
Well, more importantly, they haven't released any new encoder in quite a while. The git master is probably quite a bit faster than their last release (though not sure how much)…