Search found 3822 matches
- Fri Dec 22, 2006 3:10 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Revision 72 goals?
- Replies: 30
- Views: 10852
- Fri Dec 22, 2006 3:47 am
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Revision 72 goals?
- Replies: 30
- Views: 10852
SndChsr, yup, in fact all mac, PPC or Intel requires that file. It has never been very well documented. When I first started poking around with compiling handbrake from the source, I actually just happened to stumble on it. Brings up what is probably a stupid question, but why not just include that ...
- Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:11 am
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Minumum Mac OS for GUI
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2291
Okay, I think it may be best to stay away from bindings for now. I will just work on the small additions and suggest we leave bindings to maybe a complete rewrite of the gui. That would be best in my opinion. So, other than a couple of existing incompatibilites with 10.2 (which exist back into the t...
- Wed Dec 20, 2006 10:00 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Revision 71 testing results
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4171
Well, and someone else compiling on Intel Mac make sure I am right on this. For PPC (and as far as I know Intel) you cannot use the modified jam that comes with Xcode (see below from the BUILD file that came with HB source). On OS X, you cannot use the modified jam shipped with the developer tools, ...
- Wed Dec 20, 2006 7:10 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Revision 72 goals?
- Replies: 30
- Views: 10852
As far as binary goes, I'd say we're not ready. For one thing, that failed compile attempt in the testing thread scares me. For another, trying to support a bunch of iPod newbies the day after Christmas would be a nightmare, imo. If someone really wants it, they'll find MK2000's build. I think havi...
- Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:24 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Revision 72 goals?
- Replies: 30
- Views: 10852
- Wed Dec 20, 2006 3:30 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Revision 72 goals?
- Replies: 30
- Views: 10852
Just an update on the gui. I have been busy at work lately and between that and pre holiday stuff, I have been hard pressed to develop the gui lately. But, plan to keep plugging away at it. I am hoping to be able to make it available next week, between Christmas and New Years. I think (at least for ...
- Mon Dec 18, 2006 3:20 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Revision 72 goals?
- Replies: 30
- Views: 10852
I would very much like to see dynaflash's GUI make it into svn as well. Ideally, both his GUI and the addition of CRF would be coupled together, such that CRF and CQP (in addition to ABR) would be accessible from both GUI and CLI, giving users the best of all worlds (but then comes the burning ques...
- Mon Dec 18, 2006 3:11 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Minumum Mac OS for GUI
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2291
Minumum Mac OS for GUI
Hey, as I am working on my GUI for Mac a question arises: Do we need to have the gui stay Jaguar compatible? Right now, the mac os gui is for the most part compatible back to 10.2 (well, with the exception of the 'hidden' properities for the que buttons, which only work for 10.3 and above). By going...
- Mon Dec 18, 2006 2:37 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Diluting the mystery of Chris Long miracle MacIntel patches
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2448
SndChsr was our tester for clean Intel Mac Compile. He reported a clean compile right out of the svn (Rev71) as far as I know. jbrjake and I got the clean compiles for PPC. I belive rhester was Linux. We decided to go ahead with a rev71 without any BeOS testing (no one could think of anyone that use...
- Sat Dec 16, 2006 9:12 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Revision 72 goals?
- Replies: 30
- Views: 10852
- Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:44 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Revision 71 testing results
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4171
Awesome work folks!! Holiday stuff last night, this morning, and unfortunately tonight for me. But, I am sneaking in a fresh checkout of 72, building and setting up a nice baseline level 3 encode at 1500 ABR to see how she works!!! Tomorrow plan to hammer away at the GUI and see if its something you...
- Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:42 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Constant rate factor encoding in HandBrake's cli
- Replies: 61
- Views: 21085
- Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:32 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Constant rate factor encoding in HandBrake's cli
- Replies: 61
- Views: 21085
dynaflash, it looks like some of the GUI files have versions as well: macosx/.svn/text-base/HandBrake.plist.svn-base macosx/HandBrake.xcodeproj/.svn/text-base/project.pbxproj.svn-base macosx/HandBrake.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj macosx/HandBrake.plist Should those be updated to match? Hmmm. I have to...
- Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:20 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Constant rate factor encoding in HandBrake's cli
- Replies: 61
- Views: 21085
- Fri Dec 15, 2006 6:40 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Constant rate factor encoding in HandBrake's cli
- Replies: 61
- Views: 21085
jbr, thanks for summarizing what we did. I cant speak for SndChsr, but I was not really sure how to apply the code you posted but figured out how to modify my files straight away to reflect your changes. So my files are actually changed to reflect your patches manually. Again, coming from a Perl wor...
- Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:40 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Constant rate factor encoding in HandBrake's cli
- Replies: 61
- Views: 21085
Okay, well, that makes sense, I misinterpreted your ideas originally on the way to handle the revs. Sorry. SndChsr, on the page before this is the steps jbrjake and I took for an easy compile for ppc. I think you would want to follow those steps plus try the additional steps he states at the top of ...
- Fri Dec 15, 2006 4:52 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Constant rate factor encoding in HandBrake's cli
- Replies: 61
- Views: 21085
Maybe if SndChsr is up to it, he can get up to speed with where we are and try it. Alas, I am on ppc as well so have applied it as have you but cannot test it. PPC seems smooth in my testing so far. Are we at a point where we submit a rev 71 to the trunk with the new x264 without the intel patch and...
- Fri Dec 15, 2006 1:23 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Constant rate factor encoding in HandBrake's cli
- Replies: 61
- Views: 21085
- Fri Dec 15, 2006 1:06 am
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Screenshot of new test gui running new x264
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4219
- Thu Dec 14, 2006 11:11 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Screenshot of new test gui running new x264
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4219
Well, right now it looks like we might be getting things together with this new x264. So I really dont want to release it until the other developers check it out and want to make it available via the svn trunk here, I dont want to subvert the distribution channel we have here. Plus, it is using a ha...
- Thu Dec 14, 2006 8:52 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Constant rate factor encoding in HandBrake's cli
- Replies: 61
- Views: 21085
jbrjake Thanks for clearing that up for me. I really appreciate it. Hopefully the new x264 will be able to be folded into the rev70 code okay. But, alas, I dont think I am the one to do it. I quite obviously am over my head at the moment. The possiblities are awesome for this project and I hope we c...
- Thu Dec 14, 2006 8:24 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Constant rate factor encoding in HandBrake's cli
- Replies: 61
- Views: 21085
ABR = Average Bit Rate CQP = Constant Quantizer (I forget what the P stands for) CRF = Constant Rate Factor Okay, so : ABR should paralell to the same in the GUI version. CRF should paralell to the Constant Quality Radio slider in the GUI CQP should paralell to the Target Size in the GUI I will vet...
- Thu Dec 14, 2006 8:03 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Constant rate factor encoding in HandBrake's cli
- Replies: 61
- Views: 21085
- Thu Dec 14, 2006 6:58 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Constant rate factor encoding in HandBrake's cli
- Replies: 61
- Views: 21085
So, are you saying that an x264 only upgrade revision would have to include changes to rev 70's libhb ? Second question: in your opinion is there a downside to this? Not to sound stupid, but what were the reasons for these changes between titers rev69 and rhesters rev70? Is it to enable the h.264 ba...