HandBrake

Maybe it was a mistake, I had to say H265 (nvidia nvenc)
There are some changes, because, at slow speed, my video card processes somewhere at avg 130 fps.
Now it has increased to 400, the same settings ...

have you made any changes regarding x265 nvenc? on slow it seems to go with more fps / s to the video cover and you changed the default to 22, where it doesn't make such a big file anymore?
Is that what you were referring to in an answer given above?
please answer me

" It's fine anyway, I can't wait for the new nvenc x265 presets I asked, because at one point, I was surprised to see how a 1060 on x265 nvenc, runs with the same number of fps as a 2080TI if you don't play games and just video editing and conversion, why spend so much money on an expensive vid...

It's fine anyway, I can't wait for the new nvenc x265 presets I asked, because at one point, I was surprised to see how a 1060 on x265 nvenc, runs with the same number of fps as a 2080TI if you don't play games and just video editing and conversion, why spend so much money on an expensive video card...

one more question: in h265 nvenc, does the speed it works with matter, low vs default?
is it the same thing as when we use the processor or the conversion with nvenc, is it special ??

I only use the video card for enconding and decoding.
if I have the same results with 3060 TI, I will definitely choose the cheapest one!

I was just talking about their processing speed.
I wanted to know who will finish the same file faster
to know what I will buy in the future

Clearly, for me, no matter which card I use, it will process the same! Correct?

Let me be clear: the same settings for conversion with h265 nvenc, 2 different video cards ... 3070 or 3080 ... will one perform faster than the other? I know that in nvenc, the card doesn't really matter ... or am I wrong?

Description of problem or question: Does video card encoding speed matter? Steps to reproduce the problem (If Applicable): If I use nvenc x265, does the video card matter, the processing power which is for the number of fps / s? HandBrake version (e.g., 1.0.0): 1.3.3. 1300 last Operating system and...

Other than the fact that I had to use invenc for encoding, encoding with the processor, I didn't succeed, going bad.
What fix did you find and apply?

Thank you very much for your help
all the best

anyway, i used h265 nvenc and after finishing a clip, with the same settings as before i used them, the quality is higher, but the size of gb is the same

Thank you for the answer
I used the new version of handbrake, 1.3.0 and you seem to have also improved the quality when coding h265 nvenc, the results are much better now or do I think?

can help me somebody?

some ideeas when i use processor, to use all core?

I use this encoder because it has higher speed. Although it does them well, it will not exceed the 2-step encoding of the processor If the processor encodes faster, I would use the processor, which is better than all But going slower, I have the second option envy, weaker what is right and bigger fi...

To me it seems to be the same thing with the Quick Sync software encoder, because I'm using h265 nvidia nvenc
when converting to processor, i don't think it uses all cores.
At extra options, is there a command to increase efficiency?

I have a 7900x i9 and only if I give high speed, at the ultrafast preset encoder, it reaches somewhere at 400fps / s at medium speed I work, it does somewhere at 200 fps first pass and at second pass it does 100 and something Can there be any command to use more than 8 cores to speed up the processo...

I think you're right, I didn't read too well. I can't handle English very well.
I also have a question to ask, for which I would like to receive a clear answer.
What would be the best handbrake processor for video conversions and using all cores?
Those with fewer cores or more?

At video, at handbrake you have h265, h265 10 bit, and nvidia nvenc h265 for convertion, mkv

i use nvenc x265 because the new 265 chip from nvidia is super, they have changed newer, it has speed and quality
about QSV I asked out of curiosity, because the processor does not have integrated graphics, and that one could be used, usually being petrified

ok, thanck you

That's just what I say, without that kit, it opens up to me that I can use it. strange though, that my processor does not have integrated graphics
this is the first time such a thing has occurred
I must mention that I use windows 10 20H1 18999, last

1. I have an i9 7900x processor and when I convert it comes to x264 intel quick sync video, although the processors on socket 2066 do not have integrated graphics. Can anyone explain why that setting appears there? 2. version 1.2.2 3. log files HandBrake 1.2.2 (2019022300) OS: Microsoft Windows NT 1...