HandBrake

As I wrote before, version 1.0.3 and 1.0.7 version works in the same way. These are the data. Thanks for your time. MediaInfo Source Video 'Title' Audio Track #1 and #2 : it does not printed because its value is null General Unique ID : 177481416332914444566533599079125947215 (0x8585AD6BF8FF19DBA35A...

This is the information (the same thing happens with all my video) MediaInfo Source Video 'Title' Audio Track #1 and #2 : it does not printed because its value is null General Unique ID : 221759396813610238422107471985009635669 (0xA6D54E682FB80CF0B9C35CC5C3663155) Complete name : E:\Film\HD\Ritorno ...

I installed the latest version (1.07 64bit), but the problem is not resolved.
I searched for a post with the same problem, but I found nothing (maybe I looked in the wrong place?)
Thank you

The web-based solution seems difficult, I thought my solution could help you solve YOUR problem temporarily.
Next time I do not lose time will respond to you (haha).

I present you the solution that i use: 1- local machine W10: activated 'remote desktop' option 'allowed from remote link' 2 - router: activated 're-address ports' 3 - Notebook W10: nothing, 'Remote Desktop' is default active 4 - Smartphone W8: (installed 'remote desktop' ) In this way I can use the ...

I'll do the tests!
I update you,
thank you.

We are in an area where the choice of the solution 1 or 2 depends only on personal assessments (non-objective). For me, a compressed video means: less i/o on the home network; some devices are connected via wireless: in some moments 40Mbps (Star Trek XI) can create problems, less space for backup, m...

rollin_eng, thank you for your observations. B) HB has many great built in presets, why have you chosen your settings? the most accurate built-in is 'Super HQ 1080p 30 surround' but compared to my goal of quality it is low. - It uses the Deinterlace filter (with HD sources I do not use any filter: o...

I have a HTPC (media-center Kodi) with 4TB disks, almost completely full. It all started with the copy of "Star Trek XI" on the hard disk: its size is 35 GB (audio and subtitles: English and Italian); too much for a HD video not 3D! I tried a program for converting all my videos (and decre...

Sorry, :oops: I try to explain better (my English is at school level): the compression with "level=4.1:rc-lookahead=60:ref=4:bframes=16:b-adapt=2:direct=auto:b-pyramid=strict:me=umh:subme=10:merange=48:analyse=all:trellis=2" options is perfect for me (At the end the really important thing ...

I agree.
I consider this topic closed.
Who wants to follow the discussion this is the correct link: viewtopic.php?f=11&t=36153
thanks.

I agree with all your comments. At the end the really important thing it is that the quality of the compressed video meets our expectations! Another important thing is to do always new questions to themselves and seek the answers: for this I thank you for your help. If I have new news, I will update...

Thank you for the explanation (which was already very clear in your first post). I believe it to be correct! In addition: presumably the algorithm works in a different way according to the specified level. How else to explain these data: RF13/14/15 video cropped is greater then no-cropped video RF16...

Correct : "Given that your source was already compressed by a lossy encoder, encoding it in a "loss less" way is guaranteed to generate a larger file". But my tests show another thing: with equal RF and identical options and equal input video , the video cropped is GREATER then t...

The goal is to understand how the h264 compression works. The main questions are: 1 - why the trend of the column% Y-N is positive up to RF15, then negative? The theory of JohnAStebbins is interesting but does not explain this. 2 - The case of RF00 (lossless) is even stranger: the size of video crop...

Sorry: the previous reply contain an error: 1 - in 'placebo quality' (RF00: no compress) the Croppep-NO is greater then Cropped-YES !!?? (the two files have not the same size: why?) is : 1 - in 'placebo quality' (RF00: no compress) the Croppep-YES is greater then Cropped-NO !!?? (the two files have ...

I read all replies with great interest and I implemented my tests. I used the previous Video test Start Trek XI - blu-ray edition - 34secs 157MB - AVC L4.1 with this NEW H264 Options : level=4.1:rc-lookahead=60:ref=4:bframes=16:b-adapt=2:direct=auto:b-pyramid=strict:me=umh:subme=10:merange=48:analy...

Hi Rolling_Eng,

I have answered your question in 'windows community support' (topic 'Video h264 cropped is greater then the same Video not cropped').
You prefer that I answer in this forum?

thanks

Thanks for your mail. This is 'CROP:NO' log (search 'CROP:YES' for second log): ================================================== CROP:NO ============================================ HandBrake 1.0.3 (2017022500) - 64bit OS: Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.14393.0 - 64bit CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3225 CP...

I wrote into 'windows community support' but after 3 week and 440 views nobody answered. This is the Scenario: S0 - Handbrake 10.3 64bit - W10 pro 64bit - Intel I3 graphic HD4000 S1 - created a video test from Star Trek XI blu-ray (DVDFAB mkv passthrough 1920x1080 size:157MB length:30 seconds, bita...

This is the Scenario: S0 - Handbrake 10.3 64bit - W10 pro 64bit - Intel I3 graphic HD4000 S1 - created a video test from Star Trek XI blu-ray (DVDFAB mkv passthrough 1920x1080 size:157MB length:30 seconds, bitare:37,0Mb/s). S2 - compressed whit RF16 and options "ref=4:bframes=12:b-adapt=2:dire...