Search found 6 matches

by Agamemnoid
Sat Jan 07, 2017 10:40 pm
Forum: Windows
Topic: 1.0.1 issues that weren't in 0.10.5
Replies: 5
Views: 1278

Re: 1.0.1 issues that weren't in 0.10.5

mduell wrote:Yes, I want the source. Or a smaller section of the source, if it reproduces the problem when encoded by HB.
Once I edit the source to be shorter, the encoding succeeds in both versions. Bear with me while I find somewhere to upload the whole thing.
by Agamemnoid
Fri Jan 06, 2017 5:39 am
Forum: Windows
Topic: 1.0.1 issues that weren't in 0.10.5
Replies: 5
Views: 1278

Re: 1.0.1 issues that weren't in 0.10.5

Or if you like i can cut that same source down to a 10 second period and do it with that?
by Agamemnoid
Fri Jan 06, 2017 5:22 am
Forum: Windows
Topic: 1.0.1 issues that weren't in 0.10.5
Replies: 5
Views: 1278

Re: 1.0.1 issues that weren't in 0.10.5

Sorry do you want the source? That's 2.5GB and it doesn't have the issue. Or do you mean an example of a shorter output that does a similar thing? I have heaps of longer ones but i can try find a small one that does it if that will help? If i fond a short one, do you want it in both versions of hand...
by Agamemnoid
Fri Jan 06, 2017 3:29 am
Forum: Windows
Topic: 1.0.1 issues that weren't in 0.10.5
Replies: 5
Views: 1278

1.0.1 issues that weren't in 0.10.5

I'm encoding a video in 264 RF 20 Profile High 5.1 with Audio passthrough. The source is 1080p gameplay. Windows 7. In version 0.10.5 it encodes fine. In 1.0.1 the output video freezes at the 40 second mark until 1:17 where it comes good again. I've tried it a few times and often the output file si...
by Agamemnoid
Tue Jan 03, 2017 2:16 am
Forum: Feature Requests
Topic: [Implemented] VP9 support
Replies: 32
Views: 19403

Re: [Implemented] VP9 support

to add to what mduell said: Use H.264/x264 with High Profile, the source fps (try to make sure the source records in 30 fps or a multiple of it, but don't convert to that fps) and the source resolution The Bitrate should be between 8 and 16mbit/s for the audio use something like 196kbit/s or 256kbi...
by Agamemnoid
Sat Dec 31, 2016 2:35 am
Forum: Feature Requests
Topic: [Implemented] VP9 support
Replies: 32
Views: 19403

Re: [Implemented] VP9 support

New Years Eve 2016 and the VP9 speed is still terrible. It manages to reach about 50% usage on 2 threads out of 12 on my i7-4930k for a total CPU usage of around 10%.

It's so sad this can't be used to full effect. I upload so much stuff to YouTube and I hate seeing it get re-encoded every time :(