Search found 21 matches
- Fri Aug 28, 2020 1:37 pm
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: Can someone explain me those x264 vs x265 SSIM results?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1954
Re: Can someone explain me those x264 vs x265 SSIM results?
@rollin_eng optimal result means (for me) the lowest possible bitrate with the best quality compared to the original, where higher bitrates dont produce better files. sounds strange reading it again... i think you know what i wanted to say... @musicvid I didn't use handbrakes SSIM option, i did the ...
- Thu Aug 27, 2020 4:35 pm
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: Can someone explain me those x264 vs x265 SSIM results?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1954
Re: Can someone explain me those x264 vs x265 SSIM results?
@rollin_eng I didn't use tuning for those encodings. But I've done them again with SSIM tuning enabled. SSIM values are really close to those without tuning and filesize dropped slightly. Also added an lossless encode. CRF=21, 271MB, tune=none [Parsed_ssim_0 @ 0000022aea2abe00] SSIM Y:0.924595 (11.2...
- Wed Aug 26, 2020 6:30 pm
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: Can someone explain me those x264 vs x265 SSIM results?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1954
Can someone explain me those x264 vs x265 SSIM results?
I've downloaded the bigbuckbunny movie in 1080p, 60fps, 339MB (bbb_sunflower_1080p_60fps_normal.mp4, https://download.blender.org/demo/movies/BBB/ ). Then i've converted the file to x265 crf21 preset=medium and compared the result (271MB) using ffmpeg SSIM with the original one: [Parsed_ssim_0 @ 000...
- Sun Apr 09, 2017 8:42 am
- Forum: Benchmarks
- Topic: Request for (cpu-)benchmarks
- Replies: 25
- Views: 75934
Re: Request for (cpu-)benchmarks
So that means that high-end server cpu's with more physical cores don't have any 'real' advantage over current desktop/gaming processors in x264 video encoding? at least if we're looking at encoding-speed and filesize. Thats... unexpected... :shock: But i think this is a general encoding problem, du...
- Fri Mar 24, 2017 10:40 am
- Forum: Benchmarks
- Topic: Request for (cpu-)benchmarks
- Replies: 25
- Views: 75934
Re: Request for (cpu-)benchmarks
@Admiral_Akbar: thx @nhyone: thx :) HEVC would be a nice. But not all of my devices (TV, Tablet, ...) support hardware HEVC decoding. So i could possibly store in HEVC and let my NAS transcode it. For a single stream this might work... But accessing multiple files at the same time... I dont think so...
- Thu Mar 02, 2017 3:36 pm
- Forum: Benchmarks
- Topic: Request for (cpu-)benchmarks
- Replies: 25
- Views: 75934
Re: Request for (cpu-)benchmarks
yeah. the current version has this switch. not my old version. must be (very) old since i can't remember installing the cli-version... anyway... seems that i have to re-run my benchmark...
- Thu Mar 02, 2017 3:15 pm
- Forum: Benchmarks
- Topic: Request for (cpu-)benchmarks
- Replies: 25
- Views: 75934
Re: Request for (cpu-)benchmarks
I think so. The ui-executable has an version attribute 1.0.3. the cli-executable has no version attribute and also no switch that i can see to display version information. EDIT: My fault. I did not know that the command-line version is not installed along with the ui version. seems that I was using ...
- Wed Mar 01, 2017 3:19 pm
- Forum: Benchmarks
- Topic: Request for (cpu-)benchmarks
- Replies: 25
- Views: 75934
Re: Request for (cpu-)benchmarks
@woodstock:
nice. the "2>" did the trick
@rollin_eng:
thx. added your results to my first post.
the anamorphic switch is strange. i run my original batch with anamorphic-switch and everything went fine.
nice. the "2>" did the trick
@rollin_eng:
thx. added your results to my first post.
the anamorphic switch is strange. i run my original batch with anamorphic-switch and everything went fine.
- Tue Feb 28, 2017 4:23 pm
- Forum: Benchmarks
- Topic: Request for (cpu-)benchmarks
- Replies: 25
- Views: 75934
Re: Request for (cpu-)benchmarks
what i want to know is how much another cpu (f.e. i7-7770k or ryzen x1700 or ...) will reduce encoding time using the same settings. Hopefully this question isn't to stupid... but whats the benefit of using the command line? The only advantage that i see is that its easier to use my settings since y...
- Mon Feb 27, 2017 1:57 pm
- Forum: Benchmarks
- Topic: Request for (cpu-)benchmarks
- Replies: 25
- Views: 75934
Request for (cpu-)benchmarks
Hey guys, first of all: i dont know where to post this. currently this is just a question, in future this is hopefully a collection of benchmarks. so feel free to move if you think there is a subforum that would be a better choice. since i plan to upgrade my cpu (and other hardware) from an i7-3770 ...
- Wed Apr 20, 2016 4:18 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: DolbyTrueHD 7.1 to AC3 7.1 results in AC3 5.1
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1543
Re: DolbyTrueHD 7.1 to AC3 7.1 results in AC3 5.1
Then the GUI is buggy.
Are there any other compressed audio codecs which support 7.1 output (...and are supported by (most) home cinema systems)?
Are there any other compressed audio codecs which support 7.1 output (...and are supported by (most) home cinema systems)?
- Wed Apr 20, 2016 2:52 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: DolbyTrueHD 7.1 to AC3 7.1 results in AC3 5.1
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1543
Re: DolbyTrueHD 7.1 to AC3 7.1 results in AC3 5.1
Yeah. I know that. But i can't. I converted the file some days ago and since nothing went visible 'wrong' i deleted the logs. EDIT: I see that handbrake itself keeps logs in the user directory. nice. so here is the log: HandBrake 0.10.5.0 - 64bit Version OS: Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pac...
- Tue Apr 19, 2016 3:44 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: DolbyTrueHD 7.1 to AC3 7.1 results in AC3 5.1
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1543
DolbyTrueHD 7.1 to AC3 7.1 results in AC3 5.1
Topic says everything
Known? Bug? Limited by format/codec? Or user problem?
I know that DolbyTrueHD passthrough is causing trouble... converting too?
Handbrake 0.10.5.0 @ Win7 (x64)
Known? Bug? Limited by format/codec? Or user problem?
I know that DolbyTrueHD passthrough is causing trouble... converting too?
Handbrake 0.10.5.0 @ Win7 (x64)
- Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:28 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Scanned title-length does not match output file
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2048
Re: Scanned title-length does not match output file
i ripped the dvds with anydvd. makemkv did the job with the same sourcedata, but then i have to encode the mpeg2 files with handbrake too shrink the files... ScanLog: HandBrake svn6469 (Nightly Build) - 64bit Version OS: Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1 - 64bit CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-...
- Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:35 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Scanned title-length does not match output file
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2048
Re: Scanned title-length does not match output file
I would recommend first ripping the dvd to your hardrive instead of directly ripping the dvd from handbrake. It is much faster and less noisier. Thats what i did. I ripped all 10 dvds to my hdd using a third-party tool (not the one mentioned above :)). Then i dropped the target dir on handbrake. It...
- Mon Oct 27, 2014 6:12 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Scanned title-length does not match output file
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2048
Scanned title-length does not match output file
Hey guys, i am trying to encode some dvd-content which i have ripped to my hdd. the dvd contains five episodes of about 24min. after handbrake has scanned the data the title-select-combobox offers me 5 entries. the first is about 2h (~ 5*24) and some other optional entries. so it seems that all five...
- Fri May 23, 2014 11:29 am
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: modify existing file did not recognize audio tracks
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1545
Re: modify existing file did not recognize audio tracks
yes, its already fixed in svn6203.
so when do we get the new version?
thx for the support
so when do we get the new version?
thx for the support
- Thu May 22, 2014 3:28 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: modify existing file did not recognize audio tracks
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1545
Re: modify existing file did not recognize audio tracks
i found the problem which seems to be an bug in the current (used to reconvert) or an older (used to create) version of handbrake. the problem is the mkv chapter data. in the last lines of the activity log the chapters are listed - chapter 2 is listed with an negative number (-168406:-38:-6). i remo...
- Thu May 22, 2014 3:11 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: modify existing file did not recognize audio tracks
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1545
Re: modify existing file did not recognize audio tracks
what happens if i click on the add a track button in the audio tab? absolutly nothing. no error message. no wait cursor. Um, you can't "modify" an existing file with HandBrake. You can only re-encode. Video Passthrough isn't supported. If you only want to re-encode audio, there are other ...
- Wed May 21, 2014 4:34 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: modify existing file did not recognize audio tracks
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1545
- Mon May 19, 2014 5:32 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: modify existing file did not recognize audio tracks
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1545
modify existing file did not recognize audio tracks
Hey :) Some time ago i ripped a 2h bd-movie with two audio tracks to nearly 8gb mkv file. somedays ago, as the diskspace is low :shock:, i want to modify this existing file to encode the audio track to 5.1 AC3. i have done this before with another movie of nearly 7gb - that worked fine. but if i dra...