Search found 1 match
Search found 1 match • Page 1 of 1
- Thu Jan 20, 2011 3:42 am
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: What does RF: in constant quality stand for?
- Replies: 48
- Views: 17363
As a public service announcement to anyone who stumbles across this page by searching the forum: Anything below RF18 or so is wasteful. RF5 is clinically insane for 99.9% of source material. If you're seeing visual artifacts it's because you're not using proper encode settings or your source falls ...