Search found 18 matches
- Wed Mar 13, 2019 5:22 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: HandBrake and Intel Quick Sync - it worked, once, and I mean literally just once :(
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1217
Re: HandBrake and Intel Quick Sync - it worked, once, and I mean literally just once :(
OK, so I rebooted my laptop (just 'cause) and then opened HandBrake, loaded the hd_other_avatar_trailer.m2ts file, went to the Filters tab and set everything to "Off," then the Videos tab and changed it to H.264 (Intel QSV) then selected the target file by clicking Browse at the bottom and...
- Wed Mar 13, 2019 4:48 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: HandBrake and Intel Quick Sync - it worked, once, and I mean literally just once :(
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1217
Re: HandBrake and Intel Quick Sync - it worked, once, and I mean literally just once :(
Well, I never put that together at all that such processing could have a negative effect on the overall speed, thanks for pointing that out. I disabled all the filters (no sense in using them really for such purposes, I'm not looking to create cinema-quality encodes obviously) and got this for encod...
- Wed Mar 13, 2019 3:26 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: HandBrake and Intel Quick Sync - it worked, once, and I mean literally just once :(
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1217
HandBrake and Intel Quick Sync - it worked, once, and I mean literally just once :(
Description of problem or question: A very long time ago when I had a first generation Sandy Bridge CPU in an older Dell Latitude laptop, I remember reading about Quick Sync and thinking "Wow, it's about time we had hardware acceleration for encoding h.264, now I wonder how bad the quality wil...
- Mon Nov 30, 2015 2:08 am
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Intel QuickSync - any chance of altering the encoding options with an HD 3000 GPU?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2260
Re: Intel QuickSync - any chance of altering the encoding options with an HD 3000 GPU?
I gave it a shot with two encodes of the same source material: one using gop-pic-size=0 and another using gop-pic-size=256 - that was the only difference between the encodes, that one setting - and I see no visual difference between the two results and the final encodes are exactly the same, literal...
- Sun Nov 29, 2015 1:02 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Intel QuickSync - any chance of altering the encoding options with an HD 3000 GPU?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2260
Re: Intel QuickSync - any chance of altering the encoding options with an HD 3000 GPU?
Well obviously I'd like to get better quality from QuickSync encodes of SD/DVD content without increasing the file size, basically, but that seems like a foregone conclusion with my HD 3000. The HD 4000 might offer better support from the SDK/API so I'll have to check into that. I can do reasonably ...
- Thu Nov 12, 2015 10:39 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Intel QuickSync - any chance of altering the encoding options with an HD 3000 GPU?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2260
Re: Intel QuickSync - any chance of altering the encoding options with an HD 3000 GPU?
Well duh, as I wasn't paying sufficient attention to what I was doing, when I select the H.264 (Intel QSV) Video Codec option I neglected to note that - because I have it enabled in the options - the Advanced tab shows Advanced Query which is an input box for the command line options - DOH!!! I neve...
- Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:28 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Intel QuickSync - any chance of altering the encoding options with an HD 3000 GPU?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2260
Intel QuickSync - any chance of altering the encoding options with an HD 3000 GPU?
Hi there, I'm using HandBrake 0.10.2.7286 64-bit and I had a question about the Intel QuickSync encoding options. It's very fast, obviously, and I'm fine with that on my Latitude E6420 laptop with an Intel i5-2540m CPU (Sandy Bridge generation) which features the Intel HD 3000 GPU. Having said, that...
- Wed Apr 30, 2014 9:07 am
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: Encoding from known encoding settings per MediaInfo
- Replies: 1
- Views: 465
Encoding from known encoding settings per MediaInfo
Howdy... I'm wondering if it's possible to duplicate an encoding profile based upon the encoding settings as pulled from a MediaInfo scan on a given file. I have a video sent to me that looks great, in "SD" resolution basically (720x404) and it looks fine enough to be used on portable devi...
- Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:45 am
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Approximate (or duplicate?) YouTube results with HandBrake?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 753
Re: Approximate (or duplicate?) YouTube results with HandBra
Yah, I spent days doing test encodes of all kinds and I still never got the results I was happy with (but then again, that's a pursuit that should probably just not attempted in the first place). I'd seen that tutorial a few days ago and didn't focus on it specifically as a potential method to creat...
- Mon Oct 10, 2011 1:57 am
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Approximate (or duplicate?) YouTube results with HandBrake?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 753
Approximate (or duplicate?) YouTube results with HandBrake?
I've spent time doing some searches and never found anything of any significance so, I'm just going to ask outright: does anyone know what general or even specific settings that YouTube uses for HD content (meaning 720p and 1080p) that results in this kind of output from MediaInfo and if so, can you...
- Tue Oct 04, 2011 12:26 am
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: Nightly builds and Target Size...
- Replies: 1
- Views: 473
Nightly builds and Target Size...
I've been utilizing the nightly builds (thanks to those that create them and share 'em) and I noted that in the later/latest builds the "Target Size" option under the Video tab is no longer there as a selectable option. If it's gone forever, I suppose I can deal with that, but my question ...
- Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:43 pm
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: High Profile in 0.9.3 - why 1800 Kbps?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1165
Re: High Profile in 0.9.3 - why 1800 Kbps?
What I meant by the question is if I use 0.9.3, select High Profile, then select Film (sorry for not making that blatantly clear), it'll show a default of an ABR of 1800 Kbps - so what I'm asking is why 1800 for that particular setting? Was some testing done that discovered a "best" bitrat...
- Sat Aug 22, 2009 6:59 pm
- Forum: General Questions
- Topic: High Profile in 0.9.3 - why 1800 Kbps?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1165
High Profile in 0.9.3 - why 1800 Kbps?
Just curious about that bitrate. I mean, it looks absolutely fantastic, but I'm still rather new to the x264 encoding stuff (after having done Divx/Xvid type encodings for years), so I was wondering how the developers happened upon that specific bitrate for the High Profile setting, if anyone can of...
- Sat Aug 22, 2009 2:12 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Newest svn and soft subs...
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1535
Re: Newest svn and soft subs...
Ok, scratch that last post, I re-installed the svn 2592 build just for giggles, and now it's working for some reason. Maybe the first time I tried this it was using older files in the same directory, I don't know, but now it's working and I ended up with an MKV file (just did a 1 chapter test encode...
- Sat Aug 22, 2009 1:36 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Newest svn and soft subs...
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1535
Re: Newest svn and soft subs...
Yes, but in doing so they're burned in permanently even when I deselect Burned in, that's where I'm really having an issue. I pick the English (Bitmap) selection on the drop down list, make sure Burned In says "No" and let it run to completion and I end up with the subs burned in, so again...
- Sat Aug 22, 2009 11:33 am
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Newest svn and soft subs...
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1535
Re: Newest svn and soft subs...
Ok, so now that my primary questions were answered, what exactly am I missing with the steps regarding getting the current svn 2592 to actually locate/use/embed the soft sub (an .srt file ripped with VSRip) because that's where I'm currently stuck. I've got the main movie loaded (from a VIDEO_TS fol...
- Fri Aug 21, 2009 11:41 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Newest svn and soft subs...
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1535
Re: Newest svn and soft subs...
Ooo... and I'm going to make an assumption that the next public snapshot will have the soft subs working? Did I make any sense at all in that post with respect to those? Am I understanding the concept correctly that it'll be a file, like an .srt or whatever, that's included in the container when the...
- Fri Aug 21, 2009 10:49 pm
- Forum: Windows
- Topic: Newest svn and soft subs...
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1535
Newest svn and soft subs...
Not sure if this is the right place for this question/request but, if it's not a Mod will most certainly move it. This is a long post, also... ;) Long time lurker, long time user, now sortakinda stuck with a situation and hoping for assistance. I'm hoping to transcode my considerable retail DVD coll...